Statistical Story

After (Dis)Orientation, the class turns its attention to trends in environmental racism, critiquing inequities around access and allocation, risks and resources. The Unit 2 assignment on Disparate Distribution requires students to demonstrate their learning around demographics, statistical literacy, and systemic injustice by communicating a pattern in environmental racism to external audiences.

Students may choose to focus on any population and environmental issue, though they are encouraged to explore communities and problems they haven’t previously studied in detail.

Through the Unit 2 assignment, students have the opportunity to demonstrate not only their familiarity with concerns in systemic racism, but also their statistical literacy and science communication skills. Both are critical to productive engagement with environmental justice.


This assignment will support students in achieving Learning Objective 3: Evaluate evidence-based patterns of environmental racism.

Assignment Details: the Statistical Story should summarise student learning on Disparate Distribution by:

Students must submit at least one graphic with an accompanying write-up. The news-style story should be approximately 500 words of analysis and explanation, with external readers as the intended audience. (As an example, the census datablog used during the class’ examination of demographics is a good example of a statistical visualisation and jargon-free report aimed at diverse audiences, though its write-up goes into greater depth than students are expected to for this assignment.)

The standard submission format will be a text file with image(s) embedded, but students might choose to publish a blog post with their visual, create an Instagram post, etc. Students intending to submit alternative formats should speak with the instructor well in advance to ensure their plans will meet the grading criteria.

Rubric: grades for this “Statistical Story” assignment will be determined according to the five requirements below.

Identify an evidence-based trend in environmental racism (5 points)

Tips for meeting the criteria:

Evaluate quantitative claims about systemic injustice (5 points)

Tips for meeting the criteria:

Communicate statistics in a visually appealing manner (5 points)

Tips for meeting the criteria:

Tell a ‘story’ through data (5 points)

Tips for meeting the criteria:

Share information about environmental racism in an accessible way for diverse audiences (5 points)

Tips for meeting the criteria: